India is a 2 trillion economy; retail accounts for 30% of GDP. Globally, as per eMarketer, 8.8% of the retail
market is e-commerce, while the figure for India is much less. Explosive growth
of e-Commerce, in India, is therefore, inevitable. The interest of PE (private
Equity) players & the stratospheric valuations commanded by the Indian start-ups
like Flipkart & Snapdeal is but symptomatic of the emerging reality. The
growth of data users to over 250 million, smartphone sales to over 80 million
per annum & increase in internet speeds, courtesy 3G & 4G networks have
only accelerated the trend. As per PWC-ASSOCHAM report 2014, e-Commerce users in
India shall grow from 40 million to 65 million & per capita annual spent
from Rs 6000/- to Rs 10,000/- within the next one year. Apparel & computer
electronics shall continue to account for a major share - 42% of e-com. As per Technopak, apart from online
retail & lifestyle, newer online business segments like classifieds, real
estate, grocery and healthcare shall gain traction. With China out of bounds, such
attractiveness was bound to attract the attention of international players.
The international behemoth, Amazon, made an impressive debut,
in 2013, & served to expand the market. E-bay on its own as well as through
its stake in Snapdeal has done yeoman service, bringing in international best
practices. The entry of Jack Ma’s Alibaba into the Indian terrain through the
stake buy in Paytm recently shall only accelerate a bloody game where customer
acquisition is the name of the game through heavy discounts, aggressive merchandising, flash
sales, daily deals & online loyalty programmes. In this dog eat dog game
some players like Indiaplaza fell by the wayside, in 2014, failing to raise
funds while Network 18, post an acquisition
by RIL, has stopped selling books – a high margin category. Yebhi.com and Bestylish.com changed their business
models to become price comparison websites or aggregators for other e-commerce
portals Therefore, the stakes
in this game are rising rapidly pushing some to emerge as leaders while others scurry
for cover. The following trends need to be keenly watched.
Omni Channel Play:
To counter the threat from the emerging e-com warriors, traditional
brick & mortar retail players are decisively opting for an Omni-channel strategy
– using multiple channels & resources including online & offline – to push
sales. Reliance Retail’s e-commerce platform restricted to grocery sales in
Mumbai alone is shaping up for a pan India expansion into new categories - selling
TVs, mobiles, laptops, home appliances & apparel - in Q4 FY15. It plans to
utilize its strategic assets - 700 reliance digital stores - for product
delivery & exchange suggesting a shift to an ubiquitous brick & click
strategy. Traditional players like Tata have started consolidating their retail
ventures & selling through their own e-store as well as through online marketplaces.
Surprisingly, they have sold the Tata Value housing deals on Snapdeal with
remarkable success. Domestic electronic retail chains like Vijay Sales &
Viveks too have caught on the trend & gone online. Aditya Birla Nuvo’s Madura
garments & Lifestyle has launched “Trendin” to further its online
ambitions. Future group - drawing on
international learnings' of a drop in retail footfalls - has entered into an
agreement with amazon to sell its “own store” brands on the latter’s online
platform. Clearly one can witness the thrilling blurring of differences between
online & offline while the possibilities of imaginative strategic
partnerships make this sector truly exiting.
GOSP & Flipkart “Billion
day” sale.
There are many players donning the missionary role to attract
more users into the marketplace model. Google,
running the “Great India Shopping
Festival” (GOSF) since 2012 has witnessed total brand partners increasing
from 90 in 2012 to 450 in 2014; companies like HP, Lenovo Group, Tata Housing Development Co, Van
Heusen, Motorola Nexus and Karbonn Mobiles have launched their products
exclusively at the festival. Flipkart, launched the “billion day sale” in 2014,
which floundered due to technical issues not before amassing sales of $100
million in gross merchandise value (GMV) indicating the latent potential of
such an initiative; after all Alibaba sold
$9 billion worth of merchandise on a
single day on Nov 11, 2014 commemorated as “Singles Day” & branded as “Double
11”. Therefore expect Flipkart’s next sale to be much bigger.
Sellers are increasingly gravitated towards an E-commerce
platform since it allows a pan India launch in an instant - a luxury denied by
traditional physical retail. Analytics makes for targeted selling while
Social Media & search engine marketing provide a greater bang for the buck.
The biggest lure, however, is the marketing support from e-com players for
brands in return for exclusivity
Fight between alternate
market place models.
Internationally, Amazon has favoured an own inventory based
model while e-Bay has pushed for a non-Inventory based one; the latter, favours
bringing buyers & selling onto a platform in return for a commission. Currently,
100% FDI is
allowed only in a non-inventory marketplace model; e-bay wants status quo while
amazon has been lobbying for change. Flipkart, started as an inventory based model but
hived off its inventory into a subsidiary WS retail to conform to the
regulations. Snapdeal meanwhile favours a non-inventory based model subscribed
to by its investors Softbank, e-Bay, Ratan Tata & Premji. E-com regulations need to be model agnostic
& if implemented shall accentuate demands on the government to revisit the
FDI policy in multi brand retail
FDI in multi
brand retail
The much controversial policy on FDI in retail was
passed by the previous UPA regime with the caveat that individual states were
at liberty to take a decision regarding market entry. AAP, while in office in Delhi,
reversed the previous Congress governments’ permission for retail entry; the
BJP, heading the current central government, has not revoked the law but has revealed
its displeasure on retail entry of multinationals, citing the fear of a likely
decimation of the mom & pop stores. It is difficult to fathom how
protecting the interests of 12 million retailers – not all of whom would be
decimated by organized retail expansion- is more important than the interest of
600 million farmers - who would gain through better prices through reduction of
intermediation - or the 1250 million
citizens - who shall gain through lower
prices & reduced inflation. It is pertinent to note that participation in a
marketplace helps retailers - currently constrained to a local geography – to expand their catchment
areas nationally & going forward, hopefully, internationally too. Any
attempted by trade to counter e-com expansion shall invite the ire of consumer
groups. Simultaneously the massive growth in e-com has raised the shackles of organized
retail which is seeking parity. Customers, ultimately, are interested in experience,
convenience & affordability & see no utility in managed differences between
traditional brick & mortar retail – organized or unorganized - & on-line
commerce. All the above vectors shall converge & ensure that FDI in retail,
eventually, shall become a reality.
The e-com sector is therefore replete with exciting
possibilities & is therefore the buzzword both on campuses &
boardrooms. The revolution has only just
begun. Stay tuned!!
Very informative post! This post gives truly quality information. I find that this post is really amazing. Thank you for this brief explanation and very nice information
ReplyDeleteB2B Marketplace
Wholesalers